![]() ![]() To understand the current status of dissection in secondary education and the attitudes toward humane teaching alternatives among the educators, I conducted a survey–for the first time–among high school biology teachers in Switzerland. However, harmful animal use in education has raised ethical and environmental concerns in the last decades and led to an ongoing debate about the role and importance of animal dissection in teaching across all education levels. 3Oxford Centre for Animal Ethics, Oxford, United KingdomĪnimal dissection has been a traditional teaching tool in biology for centuries.2Environmental Sciences and Humanities Institute, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.1Animalfree Research, Bern, Switzerland.The BioLEAP Program provides resources to teachers who want to use alternatives to animal specimens such as those used in classroom dissection exercises. The humane solutions catalog features effective non-animal alternatives to help teach students valuable skills while they learn about anatomy and physiology. From web-based programs and apps to physical models, teachers can find cost-effective solutions that meet their needs. Check out these top digital dissection programs for effective off-site teaching. The BioLEAP Classroom Grant offers awards of up to $1,000 to teachers in the United States who want to implement humane methods in their classrooms. On iTunes and covers the frog life cycle, 3-D virtual dissection. The goal of replacing classroom dissection with superior humane scientific methods for all students can only be achieved if the key players in this field are persuaded that doing so is the best course of action. We are fighting a mindset-and until that mindset changes, true progress will continue to be stymied. Key drivers in the perpetuation of this line of thinking are the country’s educational leadership organizations. In fact, a recent update to the NABT’s position statement on the “Use of Animals in Biology Education” even goes so far as to claim that the use of alternatives in place of dissection “may constitute a disservice to many students and does not acknowledge the well-documented educational benefits of hands-on dissection.” Standards published by the National Association of Biology Teachers (NABT) and the National Science Teachers Association (NSTA) promote to their members the notion of dissection as an indispensable aspect of a biology course. #Interactive virtual frog dissection game update# To fight this mindset, NAVS is working closely with educators and educational experts in the field of biology and related areas, in order to examine the desired learning outcomes of traditional dissection. By weighing the value of dissection against that of humane alternatives-including the educational, financial and environmental benefits of each method-NAVS will then be able to clearly demonstrate that the current course of action (animal dissection) that is sanctioned and promoted by the NABT and NSTA is not based on core educational values. #Interactive virtual frog dissection game update#ĭoing so will allow us to recommend the development of new educational standards which recognize the equivalence or superiority of dissection alternatives.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |